The UK government has unveiled new immigration policies that place tighter restrictions on international students, stirring opposition from universities concerned about the financial impact.
According to the recently published immigration white paper, most graduates will be permitted to remain in the UK for 18 months after completing their studies—down from the current allowance of two years. Additionally, universities with higher dropout rates may face stricter visa sponsorship rules. The government also proposes a 6% levy on universities’ income generated from international student fees.
Universities warn these measures could deepen their financial challenges. Yet, for the government, controlling immigration appears to take precedence over safeguarding university revenues.
Universities have long been regarded as one of the UK’s key global strengths, contributing significantly to both international influence and export earnings. After last year’s general election, Labour’s science minister Peter Kyle promised to end the so-called “war on universities” waged by the previous Conservative government, pledging a more welcoming stance toward international students.
However, the immigration white paper signals a shift in tone and policy. This mirrors a broader trend seen in other popular study destinations, where nationalist parties opposed to immigration have gained traction. In the UK’s case, this political pressure converges with the government’s ambition to reform the higher education sector.
Political Context and Rising Nationalist Influence
Just weeks before the white paper’s release, the Reform UK party won control of ten local authorities and secured 677 council seats, posing a growing challenge to the Labour government. Reform UK campaigns on concerns about immigration’s impact on communities and wages, a message resonating with voters who often lack university qualifications—an important demographic also targeted by similar parties across Europe and the US.
Such nationalist and anti-immigration parties elsewhere have implemented policies restricting university funding and international student recruitment once in power. But this phenomenon extends beyond nationalist groups; in Canada and Australia, both Liberal and Labour governments have introduced caps on international student intake ahead of recent elections.
The UK Labour party appears to be following a similar political strategy, prioritizing voter concerns about immigration over the financial health of universities.
Higher Education Reform and Workforce Development
The government also criticizes employers’ heavy reliance on migrant labor and universities’ dependence on international students. It calls for a shift toward developing the domestic workforce by investing in skills training and aligning university courses with future economic needs.
The white paper highlights a “long-term lack of coordination or investment” in delivering skills essential for economic growth and employment.
In England, higher education funding is complicated by a system largely driven through student loans, which incentivizes universities to cater to student demand rather than national economic priorities.
Economic stagnation combined with rising minimum wages has resulted in about 10% of graduates earning wages barely above the minimum threshold. To address this, the previous government promoted apprenticeships over degrees and allowed student loans and fees to erode in real value.
Universities have compensated by recruiting international students, particularly one-year postgraduate students from countries like Nigeria and India, many of whom bring dependents and remain in the UK for work. This model has increased university revenue but also immigration figures.
Recent changes to family visa regulations, alongside global economic and geopolitical challenges, have prompted universities to forecast a 21% drop in new international student enrollments this year, with 44% of institutions expecting financial deficits.
Unlike its predecessor, the current government has approved inflation-linked tuition fee increases for UK students for the first time since 2017. However, it demands that universities reduce dependence on international students by improving operational efficiency and focusing on courses aligned with government priorities.
With higher education largely funded by student fees, government influence is limited. The Office for Students—the regulator—has been instructed to prioritize quality assurance and financial risk management over policy direction, while its budget for strategic initiatives has been cut.
Key Measures Under Consideration
The white paper identifies three initiatives that could shape future higher education funding and immigration policy:
Reforming the apprenticeships levy to allow greater flexibility in supporting workforce development priorities.
Tightening visa sponsorship rules to steer international recruitment toward courses that develop high-level skills.
Imposing a levy on universities’ international student income to fund government priority areas rather than student preference-driven courses.
The apprenticeships levy reform is already underway with the establishment of Skills England, a new body tasked with setting investment priorities. This could potentially include funding from the proposed international student levy, although experiences in countries like Australia suggest this may face challenges.
Nonetheless, there is a clear governmental momentum toward reforming higher education and immigration policy, balancing economic needs, political pressures, and the future of UK universities.
Related topics:
- U.S. Imposes Visa Restrictions on Indian Travel Agencies Linked to Illegal Immigration
- Korea and Japan to Launch Exclusive Immigration Checkpoints in June
- What UK Immigration Reforms Could Mean for Scotland
